<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SGA Releases Lusk Memo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://knightnews.com/2009/10/sga-slow-to-respond-to-bribery-records-request/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://knightnews.com/2009/10/sga-slow-to-respond-to-bribery-records-request/</link>
	<description>UCF news, sports, Orlando college bars, Knights football, Greek Life, University of Central Florida tuition coverage, online student newspaper</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:25:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flora Rosenblatt</title>
		<link>http://knightnews.com/2009/10/sga-slow-to-respond-to-bribery-records-request/comment-page-1/#comment-10259</link>
		<dc:creator>Flora Rosenblatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 00:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knightnews.com/?p=3258#comment-10259</guid>
		<description>Hi,Superb blog post dude! i am just Tired of using RSS feeds and do you use twitter?so i can follow you there:D. 
PS:Do you considered putting video to your web site to keep the readers more interested?I think it works., Flora Rosenblatt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,Superb blog post dude! i am just Tired of using RSS feeds and do you use twitter?so i can follow you there:D.<br />
PS:Do you considered putting video to your web site to keep the readers more interested?I think it works., Flora Rosenblatt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fraternity</title>
		<link>http://knightnews.com/2009/10/sga-slow-to-respond-to-bribery-records-request/comment-page-1/#comment-7005</link>
		<dc:creator>fraternity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 20:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knightnews.com/?p=3258#comment-7005</guid>
		<description>Enjoyed the posts..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enjoyed the posts..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WOWWWW</title>
		<link>http://knightnews.com/2009/10/sga-slow-to-respond-to-bribery-records-request/comment-page-1/#comment-1397</link>
		<dc:creator>WOWWWW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knightnews.com/?p=3258#comment-1397</guid>
		<description>Yeah, Knight News is totally a legit and responsible source.  I love how the 5 second video is of some freshman wimp who is to chicken%#$^ to lift the camera up off the ground.  I feel like this is TMZ quality reporting, with special olypmics level cameramen. What a joke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, Knight News is totally a legit and responsible source.  I love how the 5 second video is of some freshman wimp who is to chicken%#$^ to lift the camera up off the ground.  I feel like this is TMZ quality reporting, with special olypmics level cameramen. What a joke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amazing</title>
		<link>http://knightnews.com/2009/10/sga-slow-to-respond-to-bribery-records-request/comment-page-1/#comment-1343</link>
		<dc:creator>Amazing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 15:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knightnews.com/?p=3258#comment-1343</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m confused, is everyone jealous that they didnt start the website with both true information and funny information?

DOnt you wish you were abotu to start making money because you are posting stuff students want to read. if you didnt want to read it, you wouldnt be here.


P.S. will lusk is fat and guilty.
P.P.S. read the heading on this page... &quot;from serious to hilarious&quot;

get over it. people wannt to read this stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m confused, is everyone jealous that they didnt start the website with both true information and funny information?</p>
<p>DOnt you wish you were abotu to start making money because you are posting stuff students want to read. if you didnt want to read it, you wouldnt be here.</p>
<p>P.S. will lusk is fat and guilty.<br />
P.P.S. read the heading on this page&#8230; &#8220;from serious to hilarious&#8221;</p>
<p>get over it. people wannt to read this stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KnightJoke</title>
		<link>http://knightnews.com/2009/10/sga-slow-to-respond-to-bribery-records-request/comment-page-1/#comment-1338</link>
		<dc:creator>KnightJoke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 02:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knightnews.com/?p=3258#comment-1338</guid>
		<description>@ Adam:

Please reread my comment so you can make sure you know what I am saying (i.e., journalistic integrity... look it up).  I can&#039;t agree with you more that news can be &quot;from serious to hilarious,&quot; but that should be the content on the news and not how it is portrayed.  If you cannot clearly see the bias on this website as it currently is, I&#039;m not going to bother trying to convince you otherwise, as your mind is already made up. Although I do wonder where the sensational graphics and multitide of articles are about Jereme Pozin&#039;s violations.  Hmmm...

Overall, Adam, it is clear that my words are not going to influence you.  Your argument begins with a faulty analogy (obviously someone defending KnightNews is an employee or fan, I&#039;m really not sure how else that can be categorized; however, just because that is the case does not mean that I am a fan or work for another source.), continues   the reasoning that the phrase &quot;from hilarious from funny&quot; somehow is an excuse for a news source to throw the concepts of journalistic ethics and journalistic integrity out the window, proceed with ad hominem personal attacks on my intelligence rather than attacking the merit of my argument, follow up with the irrelevant straw man argument that all reasoning should be dismissed not on its own merits but because myself and/or other people are &quot;supporters of Lusk&quot; (which may or may not be even true), and end by irrationally appealing to the alleged popularity of this website as a reason as to why this website is &quot;quality&quot; when I  am in fact arguing that website quality is determined by journalistic integrity and not mere &quot;website hits.&quot;  I suggest you learn a little bit more about how construct logical arguments before you attempt to make any; people can only assume you are a fool until you open your mouth and prove it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Adam:</p>
<p>Please reread my comment so you can make sure you know what I am saying (i.e., journalistic integrity&#8230; look it up).  I can&#8217;t agree with you more that news can be &#8220;from serious to hilarious,&#8221; but that should be the content on the news and not how it is portrayed.  If you cannot clearly see the bias on this website as it currently is, I&#8217;m not going to bother trying to convince you otherwise, as your mind is already made up. Although I do wonder where the sensational graphics and multitide of articles are about Jereme Pozin&#8217;s violations.  Hmmm&#8230;</p>
<p>Overall, Adam, it is clear that my words are not going to influence you.  Your argument begins with a faulty analogy (obviously someone defending KnightNews is an employee or fan, I&#8217;m really not sure how else that can be categorized; however, just because that is the case does not mean that I am a fan or work for another source.), continues   the reasoning that the phrase &#8220;from hilarious from funny&#8221; somehow is an excuse for a news source to throw the concepts of journalistic ethics and journalistic integrity out the window, proceed with ad hominem personal attacks on my intelligence rather than attacking the merit of my argument, follow up with the irrelevant straw man argument that all reasoning should be dismissed not on its own merits but because myself and/or other people are &#8220;supporters of Lusk&#8221; (which may or may not be even true), and end by irrationally appealing to the alleged popularity of this website as a reason as to why this website is &#8220;quality&#8221; when I  am in fact arguing that website quality is determined by journalistic integrity and not mere &#8220;website hits.&#8221;  I suggest you learn a little bit more about how construct logical arguments before you attempt to make any; people can only assume you are a fool until you open your mouth and prove it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://knightnews.com/2009/10/sga-slow-to-respond-to-bribery-records-request/comment-page-1/#comment-1328</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 20:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knightnews.com/?p=3258#comment-1328</guid>
		<description>@ Knight Joke-

First of all, if your going to assume that someone defending KnightNews.com is working for them or a fan of them, I guess its safe to assume that you either work for the competition or don&#039;t like someone who is employed by them. So you have just as much of a bias. 

As far as people complaining, I&#039;ll guarantee that a majority of those complaining are friends of Lusk that don&#039;t want to accept that he&#039;s corrupt. To say that people are complaining because they think KnightNews.com doesn&#039;t know the difference between &#039;news&#039; and &#039;entertainment&#039; is ridiculous. If thats why your complaining, then I say you are a complete idiot. Why don&#039;t you look at the top of your browser right now. It says &quot;KnightNews.com- UCF Knight News: From Serious to Hilarious.&quot; Can you not read something right in front of your face? KnightNews isn&#039;t passing themselves off as something their not if they say what they are on every page. Don&#039;t get mad at them if your to stupid to notice it.

And please, point out where something is biased on this article or site. I mean, I would understand if the BAMF ticket did something like this and they didn&#039;t report on it, but that&#039;s not the case. KnightNews gave both sides equal opportunity. Its Lusk&#039;s fault for refusing to give them a comment. The fact that he refused to speak to all news sources, and just chose the CFF points out, if anything, that they are biased in their reporting. Why else would he have not spoken to KnightNews? Unless he has a grudge against them because they broke the story.

And finally, whose to say that covering the news can&#039;t be entertaining too? Thats the reason why I keep coming back. These guys cover all the news and I enjoy reading the articles or watching the videos. They understand that by being entertaining and reporting the news they assure their audience comes back. Either that, or they rely on morons like you to keep coming back and leaving comments, increasing their hits. Great job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Knight Joke-</p>
<p>First of all, if your going to assume that someone defending KnightNews.com is working for them or a fan of them, I guess its safe to assume that you either work for the competition or don&#8217;t like someone who is employed by them. So you have just as much of a bias. </p>
<p>As far as people complaining, I&#8217;ll guarantee that a majority of those complaining are friends of Lusk that don&#8217;t want to accept that he&#8217;s corrupt. To say that people are complaining because they think KnightNews.com doesn&#8217;t know the difference between &#8216;news&#8217; and &#8216;entertainment&#8217; is ridiculous. If thats why your complaining, then I say you are a complete idiot. Why don&#8217;t you look at the top of your browser right now. It says &#8220;KnightNews.com- UCF Knight News: From Serious to Hilarious.&#8221; Can you not read something right in front of your face? KnightNews isn&#8217;t passing themselves off as something their not if they say what they are on every page. Don&#8217;t get mad at them if your to stupid to notice it.</p>
<p>And please, point out where something is biased on this article or site. I mean, I would understand if the BAMF ticket did something like this and they didn&#8217;t report on it, but that&#8217;s not the case. KnightNews gave both sides equal opportunity. Its Lusk&#8217;s fault for refusing to give them a comment. The fact that he refused to speak to all news sources, and just chose the CFF points out, if anything, that they are biased in their reporting. Why else would he have not spoken to KnightNews? Unless he has a grudge against them because they broke the story.</p>
<p>And finally, whose to say that covering the news can&#8217;t be entertaining too? Thats the reason why I keep coming back. These guys cover all the news and I enjoy reading the articles or watching the videos. They understand that by being entertaining and reporting the news they assure their audience comes back. Either that, or they rely on morons like you to keep coming back and leaving comments, increasing their hits. Great job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: breaking knightnews</title>
		<link>http://knightnews.com/2009/10/sga-slow-to-respond-to-bribery-records-request/comment-page-1/#comment-1314</link>
		<dc:creator>breaking knightnews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 05:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knightnews.com/?p=3258#comment-1314</guid>
		<description>You forgot KnightNews.com also broke the story on the Major OSC Rule Changes being rammed through in secrecy. 

They were the only news source to cover that story, if I remember correctly. 

And can someone explain to me how this article is biased?

It explains how SGA took longer than usual this elections cycle to respond to a records request, and said they tried getting Lusk&#039;s side but he refused to comment. 

Seems pretty straight forward to me. I don&#039;t see what&#039;s biased about it... Copy and paste what you don&#039;t like and let me know, because it all looks fair to me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You forgot KnightNews.com also broke the story on the Major OSC Rule Changes being rammed through in secrecy. </p>
<p>They were the only news source to cover that story, if I remember correctly. </p>
<p>And can someone explain to me how this article is biased?</p>
<p>It explains how SGA took longer than usual this elections cycle to respond to a records request, and said they tried getting Lusk&#8217;s side but he refused to comment. </p>
<p>Seems pretty straight forward to me. I don&#8217;t see what&#8217;s biased about it&#8230; Copy and paste what you don&#8217;t like and let me know, because it all looks fair to me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: knightfirst</title>
		<link>http://knightnews.com/2009/10/sga-slow-to-respond-to-bribery-records-request/comment-page-1/#comment-1312</link>
		<dc:creator>knightfirst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 04:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knightnews.com/?p=3258#comment-1312</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t KnightNews break the Will Lusk story in the first place?

Didn&#039;t KnightNews break exclusive details about the fraternity hazing allegations?

Isn&#039;t KnightNews the only source with details on what was likely students robbed at gunpoint at Jimmy Johns?

I think it&#039;s great KnightNews is here because I can find stuff here I can&#039;t see in the Future, and I can also find stuff in the Future I can&#039;t find here. Competition = better for students.

The industry as a whole is struggling between entertainment and news... look at the daily show, fox news, cnn, tmz, etc. Things are changing, but KnightNews hasn&#039;t gotten anything wrong yet. I trust them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t KnightNews break the Will Lusk story in the first place?</p>
<p>Didn&#8217;t KnightNews break exclusive details about the fraternity hazing allegations?</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t KnightNews the only source with details on what was likely students robbed at gunpoint at Jimmy Johns?</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s great KnightNews is here because I can find stuff here I can&#8217;t see in the Future, and I can also find stuff in the Future I can&#8217;t find here. Competition = better for students.</p>
<p>The industry as a whole is struggling between entertainment and news&#8230; look at the daily show, fox news, cnn, tmz, etc. Things are changing, but KnightNews hasn&#8217;t gotten anything wrong yet. I trust them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KnightJoke</title>
		<link>http://knightnews.com/2009/10/sga-slow-to-respond-to-bribery-records-request/comment-page-1/#comment-1306</link>
		<dc:creator>KnightJoke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 02:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knightnews.com/?p=3258#comment-1306</guid>
		<description>&quot;KnightNews has only one job, and that is to cover what is going on on campus and keep students entertained.&quot;

Reality Check (I assume you either work for this &quot;news&quot; source or are a friend one someone who does), I know it&#039;s probably hard for you to understand this concept, but the reason people are complaining is because the concepts of &quot;news&quot; and &quot;entertainment&quot; are distinct.  In case you didn&#039;t know, this is called KnightNEWS, not &quot;KnightEntertainment.&quot;  If you&#039;re going to pass yourself off as a news source, then at least know what the definition of &quot;news&quot; is and the guidelines on how to report on this elusive concept (for example... I don&#039;t know... journalistic integrity? neutral reporting? the concept of &quot;news&quot; not being &quot;entertainment&quot;? these are concepts that are taught to even elementary school student reporters that you apparently know nothing about.)  The problem with KnightNews is that it attempts to pass itself off as something it is not, and that is why people are angered by it.  If you guys want to express your biased opinion in all your &quot;news&quot; articles and sensationalize everything, fine, go make something called a BLOG and stop lying about who you are and what you do.  To do anything else is dishonest and unethical, and you deserve absolutely no respect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;KnightNews has only one job, and that is to cover what is going on on campus and keep students entertained.&#8221;</p>
<p>Reality Check (I assume you either work for this &#8220;news&#8221; source or are a friend one someone who does), I know it&#8217;s probably hard for you to understand this concept, but the reason people are complaining is because the concepts of &#8220;news&#8221; and &#8220;entertainment&#8221; are distinct.  In case you didn&#8217;t know, this is called KnightNEWS, not &#8220;KnightEntertainment.&#8221;  If you&#8217;re going to pass yourself off as a news source, then at least know what the definition of &#8220;news&#8221; is and the guidelines on how to report on this elusive concept (for example&#8230; I don&#8217;t know&#8230; journalistic integrity? neutral reporting? the concept of &#8220;news&#8221; not being &#8220;entertainment&#8221;? these are concepts that are taught to even elementary school student reporters that you apparently know nothing about.)  The problem with KnightNews is that it attempts to pass itself off as something it is not, and that is why people are angered by it.  If you guys want to express your biased opinion in all your &#8220;news&#8221; articles and sensationalize everything, fine, go make something called a BLOG and stop lying about who you are and what you do.  To do anything else is dishonest and unethical, and you deserve absolutely no respect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reality Check</title>
		<link>http://knightnews.com/2009/10/sga-slow-to-respond-to-bribery-records-request/comment-page-1/#comment-1302</link>
		<dc:creator>Reality Check</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 00:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knightnews.com/?p=3258#comment-1302</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t remember knightNews ever stating that they were trying to win a Pulitzer and be the world&#039;s most serious journalistic source.

KnightNews has only one job, and that is to cover what is going on on campus and keep students entertained. Judging by the fact that all you idiots who complain all day keep coming back over and over again, then KnightNews is actually doing a tremendous job.

Oh yea, didn&#039;t KnightNews, which has only been in existence for a few months, already pass the Central Florida Future&#039;s Alexa rating, even though the CFF has been around for like 40 years?

That is pretty embarrassing.

I guess that says something about what UCF students actually want to read about...and where.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t remember knightNews ever stating that they were trying to win a Pulitzer and be the world&#8217;s most serious journalistic source.</p>
<p>KnightNews has only one job, and that is to cover what is going on on campus and keep students entertained. Judging by the fact that all you idiots who complain all day keep coming back over and over again, then KnightNews is actually doing a tremendous job.</p>
<p>Oh yea, didn&#8217;t KnightNews, which has only been in existence for a few months, already pass the Central Florida Future&#8217;s Alexa rating, even though the CFF has been around for like 40 years?</p>
<p>That is pretty embarrassing.</p>
<p>I guess that says something about what UCF students actually want to read about&#8230;and where.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

